• 你所知道印度历史上大事件竟然是印度历史最大的谎言

  • 发布时间:2018-11-13 17:59 浏览:加载中
  •   话说今日之印度他的一举一动总是展示在西方世界与中中国对比的头版头条,作为英国殖民过的国家,在英国来时曾富甲一方,当英国离开后他便像是不会前进了,相比全世界的发展速度他的发展用倒退来形容会比较合适。然而在印度却有一些众所周知的大事件,却被指为印度历史上最大的谎言今天就一一道来。
      
      What are the greatest lies in Indian history?
      
      印度历史上最大的谎言是什么?
      
      Anand, lives in India
      
      Greatest lies of India history - Mahatma Gandhi is father of nation!!!
      
      印度历史上最大的谎言——圣雄甘地是印度国父!!!
      
      (Mahatma Gandhi is probably most misunderstood character in Indian history. I have tremendous faith in his philosophy. I think even if little of his philosophy implemented in our life, our life would change drastically. His thoughts on Ram Rajya, non-violence, Hindu-Muslim unity, simple living, satyagrah, tough principles in personal life are still applicable after 60 years. )
      
      (圣雄甘地可能是印度历史上最被误解的人物。我对他的哲学有极大的信心。我认为,即使他的哲学在我们的生活中很少被应用,我们的生活也会发生巨大的变化。他对拉姆·拉杰亚、非暴力、印度教徒与的团结、简朴生活以及个人生活中的强硬原则的看法,在60年后依然适用。
      
      Having said this, I strongly believe that Mahatma Gandhi was not at all ‘father of nation’. In fact, no one reserved to be ‘father of nation’ for India. Father of nation is western concept. It applies to countries which born in recent (200–300 years ago) times like many European countries, USA, Pakistan etc. Just for example, Pakistan came into existence one fine day and Barrister Jinnah played a lead role there. So he is father of nation of Pakistan. Pakistan this word itself did not exist. It was used first time publicly some time in 1937 (some one correct me if I am wrong). So as person who played lead role in materializing a country, Jinnah is father of nation for Pakistan. Same is for George Washington for USA.
      
      说到这里,我坚信圣雄甘地根本不是“印度国父”。事实上,没有人是印度的“国父”。国父是西方的说法。它适用于最近(200-300年前)创立的国家,如许多欧洲国家、美国、巴基斯坦等。例如,巴基斯坦是在一个晴朗的日子里由大律师真纳领导而诞生的。所以他是巴基斯坦之父。巴基斯坦这个词本身并不存在。它是在1937年首次公开使用的(如果我错了,有人会纠正我)。所以真纳作为一个国家的缔造者,是巴基斯坦的国父。美国的乔治·华盛顿也是如此。
      
      But India is not like these newly born nations. It exists for more than last five thousand years. It has all those things that are needed for a country to exist like well defined boundaries, cultural identity, great people and every other thing for that matter. Reference of all these things can be seen in history books. We can see references to Bharat, Hindustan, India, Indian food, art, music, dance, sports, great people everywhere in history books even in the oldest one also.
      
      但印度不同于这些新生国家。它存在了5000多年。它拥有一个国家存在所需要的一切,比如明确的国界、文化认同、伟大的人民以及其他一切。所有这些事情都可以在历史书上看到。我们可以在历史书中看到巴拉特,印度斯坦,印度,印度食物,艺术,音乐,舞蹈,体育,伟大的人无处不在,甚至在最古老的历史书中也能找到。
      
      It is big myth that before British came, India was scattered into different states and they build India as a single country. If that were the case, this country would not have a single country 60 years after British left us.
      
      在英国人来印度之前,印度分散成不同的邦,英国把印度建设成一个国家。如果是这样的话,这个国家在英国人离开我们60年后就不会还是一个国家了。
      
      So if it exists for such a long time why someone should be called as father of nation? Secondly majority people of this country believes country as motherland. They treat country as mother. So if country is mother how can one person be called father of nation?
      
      那么,如果它已经都存在了这么长时间,为什么有人应该被称为国父呢?其次,这个国家的大多数人认为国家是自己的祖国。他们把国家当做母亲。那么如果国家是母亲,一个人怎么能被称为国父呢?
      
      Gandhi’s high values, scarifies would always be appreciated and to honor him we can call him ‘son of nation’.
      
      甘地的崇高价值观将永远受到赞赏,为了纪念他,我们可以称他为“民族之子”。
      
      Atul Dhiman, Masters. PhD in Economics, Doon University (2023)
      
      Gandhi gave us freedom.
      
      甘地给了我们自由。


      
      This statement is one of the biggest lies that every Indian is fed with. All thanks to congress. Congress is doing it because of the last name. I am not grateful for Gandhi I am grateful Nathuram Godse ji.
      
      这是每个印度人都听过的最大的谎言之一。这都是因为国大党。国大党之所以这么做是因为甘地这个姓氏。我不感激甘地,我感激Nathuram Godse。
      
      I salute and bow down to the valour of this person, he actually saved india. And congress maligned his name. He was called terrorist and what not. After 60 years his speech (that he gave before dying) was unbanned. I ask why was it banned at the first place. Because Nathuram ji tried to speak the truth.
      
      我向这个勇敢的人致敬并鞠躬,他实际上拯救了印度。国大党还诋毁了他的名字。他被称为恐怖分子。60年后,他的演讲(他临终前的演讲)终于解禁。我想问问为什么它一开始会被禁止呢。因为Nathuram试图说出真话。
      
      If partition happened in the name of religion then why did Pakistan become an Islamic state and India a secular instead of Hindu nation?
      
      如果分裂是以宗教的名义发生的,那么为什么巴基斯坦变成了一个伊斯兰国家而印度变成了一个世俗国家而不是印度教国家呢?
      
      Why did he not help Kashmiri pandits?
      
      他为什么不帮助克什米尔的土匪?
      
      4.Why did he order Britishers to hang Bhagat Singh one day earlier?
      
      4. 为什么他要命令英国人提前一天吊死巴加特辛格?
      
      5.Why did he want to give the whole of Kashmir to Pakistan?
      
      5. 他为什么要把整个克什米尔交给巴基斯坦?
      
      6.What were the reasons for choosing Nehru over other leaders?
      
      6. 选择尼赫鲁而不是其他领导人的原因是什么?
      
      7.Why did Kashmiri pandits die in hunger and were not given proper place to live?
      
      7. 为什么克什米尔的土匪会在饥饿中死亡,没有得到像样的居住地点?
      
      8.Why did Gandhi fast for the rights of Pakistan?
      
      8. 甘地为什么要为巴基斯坦的权利斋戒?
      
      9.How did Indira Nehru become Indira Gandhi?
      
      9. 英迪拉尼赫鲁是如何成为英迪拉·甘地的?
      
      10.There are thousands of questions like these, the history we read, is based on false grounds. Kids are taught Nathuram Godse killed Mahatma Gandhi but nobody taught that mughals killed Guru Gobind singh ji.
      
      10. 这样的问题成千上万,我们读到的历史,是建立在错误的基础上的。孩子们被教导说纳撒拉姆戈瑟杀了圣雄甘地,但没人告诉他们莫卧儿人杀了古比德·辛格。
      
      11.We are taught Akbar, Aurangzeb, Tipu Sultan were great, and what about Chhatrapati Shivaji, Maharana Pratap, Guru Gobind Singh ji, Rani Laxmi Bai etc.
      
      11. 我们被教导阿克巴, 奥朗则布,蒂普苏丹都是伟大的任务,还有Chhatrapati Shivaji, Maharana Pratap, Guru Gobind Singh, Rani Laxmi Bai等等。
      
      Gandhi did not give us freedom. The people who really died, they gave us freedom. And believe me if Gandhi would have lived for one more year, he would have given all our riches to Pakistan, more hindus would have been killed, kashmir would have been a Pakistani territory.
      
      甘地并没有给我们自由。是那些真正死去的人,给了我们自由。相信我,如果甘地再活一年,他会把我们所有的财富都给巴基斯坦,更多的印度人会被杀害,克什米尔会成为巴基斯坦的领土。
      
      Edit 1: In 1947, kashmiri pandits were thrown out of kashmir. They were around 10,000 in number. They occupied empty mosques and madarsa for shelter. It was cold and raining. These mosques were empty and no one was using the space. Gandhi fasted and said that he would die if the Hindus did not vacate the mosques.
      
      编辑1:1947年,克什米尔土匪被赶出克什米尔。他们大约有10000人。他们占领了空荡荡的和马达尔萨作为避难所。天气又冷又下着雨。这些都是空的,没有人使用。甘地斋戒,并说如果印度教徒不腾出,他就去死。
      
      Does it make any sense?
      
      这有什么意义吗?
      
      Additionally, he didn't do a single thing for the shelter of hindus. They died on roads due to the cold and shortage of food.
      
      此外,他没有为印度教徒的避难所做任何事情。由于寒冷和食物短缺,他们死在路上。
      
      Jai Hind!
      
      印度必胜!
      
      Suzanne Marie Redalia Sullivan, studied anthropology at UCLA
      
      Five Big Fat Lies About Indian History
      
      关于印度历史的五大谎言
      
      1.'Aryan Invasion Theory,' also known as Aryan Migration Theory. This fib was concocted by Victorian-era Europeans who did not want to admit that Indo-European languages and people were indigenous to India. Some Aryan Invasion Theory fans (Mike Witzel, for one) have been expressing dismay that the DNA evidence from South Asia shows that the ancestral South Indian population has been in South India for 60,000 years, and the ancestral North Indian population, as well as the populations of Eurasia, the near and far East and the Americas, all originated in South India.
      
      1“雅利安人入侵理论”,也被称为雅利安人迁移理论。这个谎言是维多利亚时代的欧洲人编造出来的,他们不愿意承认印欧语系和印欧人是印度的本土语言。一些雅利安人入侵理论粉丝(Mike Witzel就是其中之一)就曾很失望,南亚的DNA证据表明,南印度人的祖先60000年来一直生活在印度南部,北印度人的祖先以及欧亚大陆,近东、远东地区和美洲的人口,都起源于印度南部。

  • (责任编辑:中国历史网)
    微信公众号
历史追学网

夏商周 春秋战国秦汉三国晋·南北朝隋唐宋元明清民国